Share the article
There are many advantages to traveling in Europe – with so many different countries in close proximity to each other, it’s easy to experience countless different cultures, activities and cuisines in one trip. Europe’s major cities are well connected by inexpensive short-haul flights, major highways, accessible bus routes, and an extensive rail network, making getting around the continent a breeze.
More and more European countries are making significant investments in them high speed railway systems. just last week Spain announced adding a fourth brand of high-speed trains giving travelers even more options and more competitive prices for travel across Europe. But with the growing popularity of rail travel, we have to ask – is it really worth it?
There are many advantages to traveling by train instead of flying in Europe. Most major train stations are located close to the city center or at least have good public transport links to get there. Security and customs lines do not exist, and baggage politicians are much more generous.
Train seats usually have more space than airline seats and can also be more comfortable. Reliable and often free Wi-Fi access facilitates productivity, and most lines have quiet carriages where passengers can work with fewer distractions. Train journeys are less likely to be full or congested, making last-minute rail travel easier, and the timetable is predictable and usually has shorter delays than flights.
Train travel can be very scenic, allowing passengers to see more of the countryside that they miss when traveling by plane, and they can also often offer great value to budget-conscious travelers. Train travel is often much cheaper than flights.
Many companies offer weekly or monthly passes that include multiple trips across their networkwhich makes train travel a great option for tourists who want to visit multiple cities. Some European countries even promote tourist trips by rail, offering special benefits. Rail is also much more efficient than flying, making it a great eco-friendly option.
But in most cases, time is money. While most would agree that rail travel has many advantages, how does this measure up when comparing the length of time it takes to complete a journey? High-speed trains are fast, but are they faster than airplanes?
The answer is a firm no, but when you factor in the time spent traveling to the airport, queuing, waiting and the journey itself, some routes are faster by train, in fact some inter-European journeys take 2 hours faster than flying!
Travel planning site research Omio looked at the differences between rail and air travel across several metrics to determine which train routes are actually faster than air travel. The study took into account the length of journeys, the distance from the airport/stations to the city centre, the minimum check-in time and even the amount of carbon dioxide emissions created by each mode of transport.
Which routes are faster by train?
The study found 27 European routes that take less time by train. Let’s take a look at a few of the most popular:
London – Brussels: time saving – 136 minutes
The train journey from London to Brussels takes 121 minutes and the flight time is 65 minutes. But when you add in a minimum of 90 minutes to check in at the airport and 117 minutes to travel to and from the airport, trains are the clear winner on this route.
The cheapest fare we found was on Eurostar. A one-way ticket on a Saturday in June is $79 and includes 2 pieces of luggage plus 1 carry-on bag and free Wi-Fi. Tickets can be reserved online, by phone or at the station. By comparison, a non-stop British Airways flight on the same date costs $66.
Frankfurt – Cologne: time saving – 124 minutes
Traveling by train from Frankfurt to Cologne will save passengers more than 2 hours! Germany’s high-speed trains are impressively fast, and there are currently no direct flights between the two cities. This means that the actual journey time takes 30 minutes longer than traveling by train because you have to change trains.
A train ticket between two destinations can be booked Deutsche Bahn and costs less than $20 for a Saturday in January. The fastest flight we could find for the same date is Lufthansa, which stops in Munich at 1 hour 20 minutes and costs $232
London – Paris: time saving – 108 minutes
The journey from London to Paris will take 136 minutes by train and 70 minutes by plane. When you add in the waiting time at the airport and the intercity tourists who have to travel to get to the airports of both cities, rail is a great choice.
In early spring, Eurostar one-way travel between London and Paris costs $84, while the cheapest same-day British Airways flight is $122.
Rome – Naples: TSaving time – 87 minutes
The train journey between the Italian cities of Rome and Naples is only 20 minutes longer than the flight, and both cities have train stations very close to the city center, while the journey to the airports is not so convenient.
Trenitalia will take travelers from Rome to Naples for less than $15 in 2 hours and 44 minutes. The ITA flight between the same destinations takes 50 minutes and costs $98.
Traveler alert: Don’t forget insurance for your next trip!
↓ Join our community ↓
The Travel Off Path Community Group on FB has all the latest reopening news, conversations and Q&As happening daily!
SUBSCRIBE FOR OUR LATEST PUBLICATIONS
Enter your email address to subscribe to the latest Travel Off Path news straight to your inbox
This article originally appeared on TravelOffPath.com
https://www.traveloffpath.com/travel-between-these-european-cities-is-much-faster-by-train-than-by-plane/ Traveling between these European cities is much faster by train than by plane