“I am very pleased with almost every program in terms of its overall direction, the requirements seem reasonable, and that our cost estimates are quite good,” said Doug Bush, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Procurement, Logistics and Technology. , in its first roundtable in the media since being approved by the Senate last week.
While the Pentagon is advancing a strategic turn toward the Pacific and close rivals in China and Russia, the military It is expected to become the main payer of bills. Army Minister Christine Wormouth has consistently stated that “all on the table”For potential adjustments, and Army Chief of Staff General James McConville reiterated those comments last week, saying the service would“ carefully review ”its major 35 modernization programs.
Bush warned during a nomination hearing earlier this year that “aggressive terms”Upgrading programs can be challenging for the service. The best way to survive the program, Bush said, is to prove its worth as an investment.
“We will get extra funding for field work if we show as an army that we can get things through research and development [research and development], a prototype, the soldiers like it, get it in the field, ”Bush said. “So we have to put a few points on the board and I think we will. I think it will allow us to compete with all the other needs of the army – I understand very well that the army has a lot of needs – to get enough money for modernization to achieve its goals. “
The Army has bookmarked what it calls its “31 + 4 programs” – simply put, 35 – iconic modernization programs, ranging from new power tools to ground vehicles and artillery, all of which are scheduled to be given to soldiers at various times on over the next decade. . The top leaders of the service advertise the program as the largest modernization of the army in the last 40 years and crucial for the next few decades of conflicts with close counterparts.
The Army aims for fiscal year 2023 to have 24 of these subscription programs or prototypes at various stages. A crucial aspect of the modernization programs is keeping the schedule, fulfilling the cost estimates and successfully transitioning between the prototype and the record program, Bush said. .
“We have a lot of efforts that are at this tipping point over the next few years. So that will be my attention, ”he said.
But the military also has several modernization programs – such as two future helicopter programs or an additional manned combat vehicle – the acquisition of which extends to years after the mid-2020s. Experts fear that the program with longer periods the risk will fall and in the future may be reduced.
“We need our industry partners with whom we work to meet cost and schedule, cost and schedule still matter. That’s why I think that’s the main thing, “Bush said. “It’s more about the fact that if the army still has requirements for this ability in the future, and the program works well, in terms of keeping a clear path, then I think all of these things will compete very well.”
https://breakingdefense.com/2022/02/army-modernization-programs-need-to-put-points-on-the-board-top-acquisition-chief/ Army modernization programs should put “dots on the board”: Chief of Procurement – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense